Cactus Conservation Institute Clarification Note about Decriminalize Nature Claims

It has been brought to our attention that Decriminalize Nature has presented words from our most recent article in their social media in a way that implies we support their political agenda. Selectively taking a sentence out of the context of the rest of the article is misleading and counterproductive. We have said this before, but we would like to emphasize it again: We do not align ourselves with Decriminalize Nature or any other political organization. The Cactus Conservation Institute promotes scientific research on conservation, and maintains a respectful relationship with the Native American Church and those who rely upon peyote as a sacrament. CCI has opted out of engaging on political issues around decriminalization. We hope that in our article we are able to explain some of the complexity rationally, objectively and respectfully, taking conflicting evidence and points of view into account. We encourage anyone interested to read the whole paper and judge for themselves.

Reference: Ermakova, A. O., Terry, M. K., & Trout, K. (2022). Cultivation as a conservation tool for cacti: review of the botanical evidence and a case study of Lophophora williamsii. Bradleya2022 (sp40), 71-82.

See more publications here: https://cactusconservation.org/resources/cci-publications/ 

More Chronicals

Queering Psychedelics: A Resource Toolkit”

Queering Psychedelics is part of Chacruna's ongoing work to uplift queer, trans, non-binary, and gender-expansive...

Rethinking Psychedelic Risk

Bia Labate argues psychedelic risk is exaggerated through colonial, moralizing narratives that conflate risk with...

A Call for Women’s Representation in Psychedelic Research

Based on a scoping review of psychedelic research for substance use disorders, this chronicle explores...
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
post
page
product
tribe_events
resource
Loading...